Lustig, S.L., Delucchi, K., Tennakoon, L., Kaul, B., Marks, D.L., & Slavin, D. (2008). Burnout and Stress Among United States Immigration Judges. Bender’s Immigration Bulletin, 13, 22-36.
Abstract: Immigration Judges (IJs), whose enormous caseloads consist of one horrific story of human suffering after another, are at risk for stress and burnout, conditions which make adjudicating cases that much more challenging. Although stress and burnout have been documented among other professionals who work on a daily basis with traumatized populations, these conditions have never been quantified among IJs. All 212 practicing IJs were invited to participate in a web-based survey that asked generally about the work environment and used the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale (STSC) and the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) to inquire about stress and burnout respectively. A total of 96 IJs (45.3%) responded to the survey. IJs indicated they were suffering significant symptoms of secondary traumatic stress. They also reported more burnout than has been seen with any other professional group to whom the CBI has been administered, including physicians in busy hospitals and prison wardens. Female IJs reported significantly more stress and burnout than their male colleagues, a difference that was not explained by variations between men and women of other demographic variables or working conditions. Recommendations to reduce stress and burnout are discussed, namely decreasing caseloads, hiring more IJs, increasing support staff, reexamining case completion goals, and developing a support network for IJs.
http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/ImmigrJudgeStressBurnout.pdf
Additional Resources
-
resourcePractice update: What professionals who are not brain injury specialists need to know about intimate partner violence-related traumatic brain injury
-
resourceImmigration Detention and Faith-based Organizations
-
resourceTreating patients with traumatic life experiences: providing trauma-informed care
-
resourceNeuropsychological assessment of refugees: Methodological and cross-cultural barriers